Hi everyone,
Just curious on what the approach everyone is taking on configuration compliance checking these days. I've seen an older post here that suggests Napalm validators, but it looks like that's more for validating deployments which we've already implemented; whereas I'm interested in managing configuration drift for base config (think NTP, firewall, syslog servers etc).
Eventually the end-goal would be to automate the deployment as well, so this wouldn't be as much of an issue but we're not there yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment