Hi all,
I have discovered that my predecessor used sometimes option 1 (subject) and sometimes option 2 to establish links between switches, example below:
switchport access vlan 333
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 333
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,3,4
switchport mode trunk
Can anyone summarize REAL benefits or disadvantages of using one or another ?
Obviously the fact that using /30 subnet for the dedicated "link" vlan (333 ^^^) wastes one of those 4096 available, but apart from that, from performance or any other perspective ?
Maybe the possibility of easily adding more VLANs to the "VLAN-ed link" in the future ?
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment