I haven't had time to lab this out so unfortunately I can't verify, but the classic error message of "% 192.168.1.0 overlaps with GigabitEthernet0/1" could be bypassed by using duplicate network on two different routed interfaces as long as they were in different VRF's so that the routing table wouldn't have any route/interface selection discrepancies? Alternatively I am not sure how this would affect eBGP instances, I bet negatively.
Any thoughts or experience in this regard?
No comments:
Post a Comment