Servers in their own VRF need to access routes in multiple other VRFs. Instead of route leaking I decided to use filter based forwarding to match on destination address and forward using a next-hop in a different VRF. Alternatively I could create around 20 static routes and specify a next-hop table for each. Are there any advantages / disadvantages to either approach? *Route leaking is not an option as I'm working with around 50k routes*
No comments:
Post a Comment