tl;dr - Isn't higher number = more priority with Layer 2/CoS QoS? Or is Palo Alto different?
I inherited a Palo Alto setup from the prior guy who inherited it from the prior guy who was (supposedly) a firewall expert. I noticed something weird with regards to the QoS config, and I'm wondering if I'm wrong or if maybe this guy wasn't the expert that I'm told he was.
This is a flat L2 network, no routing anywhere, so I understand that CoS tags are appropriate. But . . . in CoS, isn't higher number = better? I thought the standard for 802.1p was 5 for Voice and 4 for Video.
Does Palo Alto do L2 QoS tagging differently, or did "that guy" have his wires crossed?
No comments:
Post a Comment