Sunday, July 15, 2018

Would this be a good standard for naming/numbering VRFs, RDs, and Route Targets?

I'm thinking that for VRFs it would be best just to use the Customer's Name / Service Account Number; for RDs it would be best to use <global loopback ip address>:<unique number>; and for RTs it would be best to use a global account/service number for the customer.

Is this a good design, or would there be a better/more scalable way to go about this?

(Note: This isn't for a real production network, just my [extensive] home lab)



No comments:

Post a Comment