I am considering rolling out a new core design where we have two 6800s in two geographical locations (1/4 mi. apart), and each major distribution switch is connected to a port on one physical unit and also the other. The current core design is using equal cost multipath EIGRP, but I feel like we can move toward another configuration design for the new core (NĂ¼Core).
My thinking was to LAG the interfaces at both ends and build routing across SVIs using EIGRP. So instead of a physical port acting as the routed link, it would be the port-channel. Is there a massive performance hit here or am I not fully thinking through the architecture in this idea? I'm open to suggestions and caveats on this.
No comments:
Post a Comment