Hello redditors,
Currently working over a new design for a VPS provider (smallish one) that also provides a service that a lot customers will want (lets call this service, the "critical service").
Basically I made a high level overview of the design that you can see in the following picture:
Aside from the critical service and Internet, xconnects may be offered between DCs to certain customers (perhaps via VPLS), the DCs aren't owned by the VPS provider, it's colocated.
Now a little bit more of information here, we basically need:
- 3 VRFs (Internet, Critical Service, Management)
- I want traffic to flow as optimal as possible
- Most of incoming and outgoing Internet traffic is going to be from/to DC1
- Since both DC are colo, it means spacing for networking equipment is a concern, want to be as effective with space as possible
- Money is also a concern so nothing ASR9X for instance is possible
- This isn't a heavy east-west like DC, for instance the critical service will have its own network isolated and only expose a set of connection IPs via firewalls to the main Network, but we don't expect a huge amount of traffic from main network to these IPs
- Critical and Internet service must be isolated so I was thinking customers must have 2X ports, 1 for the Internet, and the other for the critical service, or just trunk and use VLANs
- Due to costs and limitations around geography where this will work, it's not expected to have more than 1 Gbps of BW per provider, and no more than 10GE per IX
- Redundancy is also a concern here
I've wrote more details in the image, I have some doubts here:
- I either terminate the DCI connections at core/dist switches (still deciding whether a chassis would be better), meaning those switches needs to get full BGP routes for optimal routing or..
- Terminate the DCI at the edge, collapsing EDGE and DCI into 1 or 2 appliances per DC, so core only see local routes plus default
- What do you think overall about the design? what would you collapse or not? Again, this is a VPS provider that also offers a special service to some customers
If you need more info please feel free to request it, for this design we're thinking on going mainly with Huawei.
Edit: I forgot to add 2 key important facts:
- Basically we have no experience at all with EVPN and VxLAN that's why we went to first think on MPLS
- We do not intent to span L2 between DCs, aside from the occasional XCONNECT for a customer (and this would be PTP)
No comments:
Post a Comment