Tuesday, December 10, 2019

iBGP peering issue between Cisco N3k's

Hi all,

I am hoping you can provide some help with an iBGP peering issue. I have a customer site where there are two circuits (same carrier) for redundancy that terminate into two separate Nexus 3048s. I have eBGP configured on the uplinks and I am trying to configure iBGP between the two units. I do not have OSPF running as an IGP, just static routes for the peer subnets.

interface Vlan105

description L3 Uplink to Matrix LAN

no shutdown

vrf member matrix

no ip redirects

ip address 192.168.105.5/28

hsrp 105

preempt

priority 150

ip 192.168.105.4

interface Vlan951

description Private VRF

no shutdown

vrf member matrix

no ip redirects

ip address 172.16.72.2/30

vrf context matrix

ip route 0.0.0.0/0 172.16.72.1

ip route 10.5.160.0/24 192.168.105.1

ip route 172.16.0.0/16 192.168.105.1

ip route 172.16.72.4/30 192.168.105.6

matrix.maumee-spectrum.n3k# ping 172.16.72.6 vrf matrix

PING 172.16.72.6 (172.16.72.6): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 172.16.72.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.186 ms

64 bytes from 172.16.72.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=1.17 ms

64 bytes from 172.16.72.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=1.116 ms

64 bytes from 172.16.72.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=1.04 ms

64 bytes from 172.16.72.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=1.536 ms

matrix.maumee-spectrum.n3k# sh ip bgp vrf matrix summary

Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd

172.16.72.14 32732 6145 5613 23 0 0 3d21h 15

172.16.72.64 65101 0 4480 0 0 0 3d21h Idle

router bgp 65101

log-neighbor-changes

vrf matrix

address-family ipv4 unicast

network 10.5.160.0/24

network 192.168.50.0/24

network 192.168.55.0/24

network 192.168.60.0/24

network 192.168.65.0/24

neighbor 172.16.72.1 remote-as 32732

description eBGP to cor01.d35

address-family ipv4 unicast

soft-reconfiguration inbound

neighbor 172.16.72.6 remote-as 65101

description iBGP to matrix.maumee-att.n3k

address-family ipv4 unicast

soft-reconfiguration inbound

Thanks in advance,

AT



No comments:

Post a Comment