Friday, May 3, 2019

Risk of not removing a provisioned switch that is no longer there?

At my work we have a switch that used to be a part of a stack. However the master died and we pulled it out. Now it's just the 2nd switch running as a single switch, not stacked with anything else. However, if you show stack on it, it still thinks it is part of a 2-stack and switch 1 is missing.

It's an easy fix: remove provision, renumber stack, change priority, but the company I work for is super anal about changes. I have to write up a report on the risk of not doing the change.

Anyone have any reasons they could think of that would be a risk of not doing this? Everything runs fine the way it is, but it's not the standard so I want to change it.



No comments:

Post a Comment